Betting News - Top Trainers

Although natural ability plays a role in every horse race around the country, there is undoubtedly a human impact on the outcome of races. Jockeys and trainers can help horses reach their potential or prevent them from achieving it. Betting News trainer analysis tool is here to help horseplayers understand which type of trainers have runners in today's race.

One of the key elements of understanding trainers is the fact that trainers are creatures of habit. When they find something that works, they will repeat it over and over. This may include frequent success at a certain distance, on a certain surface, at a certain level, or during a specific meet. This is where the power of Betting News' trainer analysis tool can be a huge asset to any handicapper.

By using the filters a player can get away from using standard win and in-the-money percentages and instead break down how the trainer specifically does in races that fit today's conditions. This may suggest that a super trainer that everyone is likely to use may not have the horse ready to go today or that the little low percentage barn is ready to fire their one shot today. Either way it can mean a profitable day at the races. As you adjust the filters the DHP ratings will also adjust to reflect the trainer's proficiency at getting a horse in-the-money under the selected conditions.

Don't forget to check out the jockey analysis tool to give yourself a further edge on the competition!

Track

Surface

Condition

Distances

Race Types

Posts

Top Trainers

Name Starts Win % Show % DHP
1st/2nd/3rd
4th or 5th
6th +
Shane Wilson 976 11% 33% Bad
324
251
401
Steven M Asmussen 919 19% 47% Good
433
223
263
Joe Sharp 887 19% 47% Good
416
217
254
Brad H Cox 870 28% 63% Great
546
183
141
W Bret Calhoun 847 19% 49% Good
414
200
233
Thomas M Amoss 760 23% 53% Great
404
174
182
Ron Faucheux 733 24% 55% Great
405
153
175
Joseph M Foster 691 10% 34% Bad
233
174
284
Sam B David 642 12% 44% Poor
280
144
218
Michael Stidham 626 15% 43% Poor
268
147
211
Albert M Stall 564 16% 47% Avg
264
121
179
Joe O Duhon 549 10% 36% Bad
200
119
230
Corale A Richards 494 8% 31% Bad
152
146
196
Chris A Hartman 474 20% 54% Good
255
97
122
Gregory D Foley 464 16% 46% Avg
212
103
149
Howard Alonzo 450 7% 26% Bad
116
119
215
Eduardo Rodriguez 449 11% 36% Bad
163
123
163
Jose M Camejo 442 16% 45% Avg
199
103
140
Brendan P Walsh 438 16% 45% Avg
195
110
133
Dallas Stewart 432 16% 48% Avg
207
90
135
Karl Broberg 404 15% 41% Poor
165
96
143
Lee Thomas 403 11% 34% Bad
136
90
177
Mark E Casse 366 16% 44% Avg
162
90
114
Gary M Scherer 355 13% 38% Bad
134
86
135
Keith G Bourgeois 340 14% 44% Avg
150
83
107
Scott Gelner 339 9% 32% Bad
110
97
132
J Keith Desormeaux 332 14% 41% Poor
135
84
113
Justin Jeansonne 330 17% 46% Avg
152
77
101
Michael J Maker 315 11% 40% Poor
125
82
108
Sturges J Ducoing 297 14% 43% Poor
127
70
100
James E Hodges 281 14% 45% Avg
126
64
91
Michelle Lovell 279 11% 42% Poor
116
71
92
Patrick Mouton 257 11% 31% Bad
80
79
98
Brett A Brinkman 256 9% 36% Bad
91
59
106
Steven B Flint 255 12% 39% Poor
99
75
81
Hugh H Robertson 240 15% 44% Avg
106
63
71
Cesar Govea 238 11% 27% Bad
65
80
93
Steve R Margolis 236 15% 40% Poor
94
61
81
Emile Schwandt 235 11% 31% Bad
74
52
109
Wayne M Catalano 232 14% 40% Poor
93
63
76
John Ney 231 12% 36% Bad
83
54
94
Neil L Pessin 229 13% 39% Poor
89
61
79
Louie J Roussel 223 16% 43% Avg
97
69
57
Samuel Breaux 218 8% 30% Bad
66
55
97
Nathan D Hatcher 216 5% 17% Bad
37
52
127
Gennadi Dorochenko 214 4% 21% Bad
45
68
101
Denise Schmidt 212 8% 27% Bad
58
56
98
Cherie DeVaux 212 21% 50% Good
106
41
65
George Leonard 207 10% 37% Bad
77
55
75
Grant T Forster 203 17% 48% Good
98
48
57

Why Trainers Matter?

Trainers are entrusted by the owners of the horse to prepare them to win races. Think of a trainer like the coach of a team. Individually the trainer cannot win the race, but the way the trainer prepares the athlete for the race can maximize the horse’s ability. This becomes especially important as horses start to mature beyond their two year old season.

Why is the DHP Top Trainer Tool Helpful?

Horses can be upgraded or downgraded based on their trainers, but many people will overgeneralize the effectiveness of a trainer based on their overall win percentage. However, even the best trainers have blind spots and the weakest trainers have some ability that allows them to pay bills and attract new owners to their barn.

Using the DHP Top Trainer Tool for a Race

To use the top jockey tool follow the steps below:

  1. Change the drop down menus to match any or all of the conditions for the race you are handicapping.
    • Track: Many trainers will have meets that they like to point their horses to. It is very hard to have horses fully cranked year round. Knowing which meets a trainer targets can be a great separator.
    • Surface: With dirt and turf surfaces running so dramatically different in terms of race flow, it is not surprising that many trainers who excel on dirt are less effective with turf runners. The same is true for those who are prolific with turfers.
    • Condition: This factor plays the biggest role when the ground is not fast or firm. Off tracks typically will favor trainers that are good at putting early speed into their horses.
    • Distance: Horse races are often classified as either sprints (less than 8 furlongs) or routes (one mile and over). However, dynamics can change dramatically depending on the various lengths within each of these categories. If a trainer is good at training sprinters, they may be left vulnerable in route races and vice versa.
    • Race Types: This is especially important for trainers. Some trainers get the best of the best talent at the track which will be reflected with high marks in the stakes and allowance ranks. Some trainers are masters of the claiming game (buying and selling horses out of races). A claiming trainer who sends out a stakes runner may be in too deep. A top stakes trainer may be racking up high percentages with good animals but when they drop to the claiming ranks, they can’t move average horses forward. Understanding which levels the trainer excels at is paramount to unlocking hidden value in races.
    • Barriers/Post Positions: Post position stats for trainers are of limited importance and may be used to eliminate horses in clear weak spots for the trainer, but likely won’t uncover any actionable angle by itself. This filter can still be useful, but should be used in combinations with other filters in the menu.
  2. Once you have set any or all of the filters, select the “Refresh Charts” button to see the updated data which reflects your race.

Using the Top Trainer Tool for an Individual Trainer

While the top trainer tool is extremely effective for comparing all trainers in a given race, it can also be a major factor when analyzing an individual trainer.

This can be done from the top trainer charts. Simply find the trainer you want to look up and click their name. You will now see a report of their rating and percentages at every one of the filters from the top trainer tool.

Using this view you may be able to identify spots where you can beat a high percentage trainer. For example, Bob Baffert wins at a nearly 30% clip across all races. His horses are often crushed at the windows and offer little value. However, looking closer at the trainer profile the is rated as “Poor” on turf. Many people will see the 28% winning percentage and bet his horses without recognizing that many of his turf runners do not perform to the level of his dirt contingent. This can provide a great advantage for the horse player who can look to fade this super trainer on turf.